Cyber security is crucial for protection against threats for smart grids

The Executive Director of Enisa, Professor Udo Helmbrecht, commented, “An understanding of the cyber-threat landscape is indispensable for identifying which protection measures are necessary for smart grids. This report is the response to the urgent question of energy providers and stakeholders: It provides the tools to assess risk exposure of smart grid assets. In cyber security, we need common efforts and coordination to reduce impact.”

This report provides a threat landscape affecting smart grid components. It takes stock of available cyber security and protection approaches as well as good practices in the field. The study also lists internal threats affecting IT smart grid assets, including a variety of threats emanating from errors and insider attacks.

Some key conclusions identified are:

  • Consider external and internal threats: in cyber security, external cyber threats constitute the main source of external exposure. This cyber threat environment originates from threat agents, utilising cyber threats and launching cyber attacks.
  • Decompose and classify smart grid elements being exposed to threats: from electrical assets like cables, switches, routers, sensors and information to software such as operating systems, services, hardware, infrastructure, and the persons operating the systems.
  • Use available knowledge: reuse existing good practices after defining the level of desired protection.
  • List the specific smart grids cyber threats, for example:
    – Eavesdropping/interception/hijacking: e.g. information leaking, electro-magnetic/radio frequency interception, sniffer attacks, failures of devices and systems, attacks, and physical attacks,
    – and the threat agents, such as corporations, cybercriminals, employees, hacktivists, nation states, natural disasters, terrorists, the new element of cyber fighters
  • Assess vulnerabilities and risks in smart grids.
  • Assessments to be done by asset owners: Finally, the Agency concludes that the threat exposure and risk assessment of a smart grid can only be done by the asset owner, who masters the complexity and interdependencies of the related smart grid infrastructure.

For full report

www.enisa.europa.eu

Neueste Artikel

Städte und Gemeinden sehen auch nach den Ergebnissen der Neuauflage des Zukunftsradar Digitale Kommune im Jahr 2019 einen hohen Nutzen durch die Digitalisierung. Gleichzeitig werden auch in diesem…

Die Startups in Deutschland werden skeptischer. Aktuell sagen nur noch 39 Prozent der Gründer, dass sich in den vergangenen zwei Jahren die Lage für ihr eigenes Startup verbessert hat….

Seit Mai 2019 stellt das BSI ein zweistufiges Schulungskonzept zum Erwerb eines neuen Nachweises zum IT-Grundschutz-Praktiker und IT-Grundschutz-Berater zur Verfügung. Auf der BSI-Webseite steht nun der Antrag zur Zertifizierung…